ReviewBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2026
An Overview and Trend Analysis of Biosimilar Approvals in China.
Review in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biosimilars are a critical strategy for improving access to high-cost biologics and ensuring the sustainability of healthcare systems worldwide. Over the past decade, China has transformed from a nascent market into one of the world's most active regions for biosimilar development. This review evaluates this transformation with a focus on regulatory evolution, approval dynamics, and global integration. We trace the development of China's biosimilar regulatory framework from the foundational 2015 Technical Guidelines to the current system of 19 technical and product-specific guidelines, highlighting the maturation of a stepwise, science-driven comparability paradigm aligned with international regulatory standards. Drawing on a systematic analysis of 83 biosimilars approved between 2019 and 2025, we analyze trends across molecular classes, therapeutic areas, and regulatory review pathways, illustrating how regulatory expectations and sponsor development strategies have evolved through representative case examples. Notably, the 2025 annual reports from both the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency emphasize the increasing number of biosimilar approvals, therefore, we place China's approval experience in brief comparative context. Finally, we discuss China's expanding biosimilar development pipeline in the context of the forthcoming global biologics patent cliff and ongoing international initiatives to streamline biosimilar development, highlighting China's increasing integration into the global biopharmaceutical landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307859What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.