Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307846›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026

Metagenomics and metatranscriptomics of prokaryotic and fungal microbiomes in produced water associated with petroleum degradation and pipeline corrosion from an oil terminal in Brazil.

Rosimeire Floripes Gomes, Glen Jasper Yupanqui García, Mariana Santos Cardoso, Joyce da Cruz Ferraz Dutra, Vinicius de Abreu Waldow, Rubens Nobumoto Akamine, Maíra Paula de Sousa, Claudia Groposo, Bertram Brenig, Henrique Figueiredo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rosimeire Floripes GomesGraduate Program in Microbiology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.
Glen Jasper Yupanqui GarcíaGraduate Program in Bioinformatics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.
Mariana Santos CardosoGraduate Program in Bioinformatics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.
Joyce da Cruz Ferraz DutraGraduate Program in Bioinformatics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.
Vinicius de Abreu WaldowPetrobras Research, Development and Innovation Center Leopoldo Américo Miguez de Mello, Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-915, Brazil.
Rubens Nobumoto AkaminePetrobras Research, Development and Innovation Center Leopoldo Américo Miguez de Mello, Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-915, Brazil.
Maíra Paula de SousaPetrobras Research, Development and Innovation Center Leopoldo Américo Miguez de Mello, Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-915, Brazil.
Claudia GroposoPetrobras, Criciúma, 88801-505, Brazil.
Bertram BrenigInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, University of Göttingen Burckhardtweg, Göttingen 2, D-37077, Germany.
Henrique FigueiredoVeterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.
Vasco Ariston de Carvalho AzevedoInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.
Aristóteles Góes-NetoInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil. arigoesneto@icb.ufmg.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prokaryotic microbial communities involved in hydrocarbon degradation and associated with oil pipeline corrosion have been extensively studied. Nonetheless, fungi can perform significant metabolic activities in these environments. Studies evaluating metabolically active microbial communities in oil reservoirs are limited. Our study investigated the total/DNA and active/RNA communities of Archaea, Bacteria, and Fungi in produced water samples from an onshore terminal in Brazil. DNA and RNA were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform, and the meta-omics sequences were analyzed. Shannon alpha diversity (taxonomic and functional) revealed that total communities were more diverse than metabolically active ones, with Bacteria showing higher diversity than Archaea and Fungi. The bacterial genera Syntrophotalea (sulfur reducer) and Pseudodesulfovibrio (sulfate reducer) were most prominent in total communities, while Halanaerobium (acid producing) dominated active communities. These results confirm the presence of Microbially Influenced Corrosion (MIC); however, the aprAB and dsrABC genes showed very low expression. Methanogenic Archaea Methanocalculus, Methanoplanus, and Methanothrix were frequent in both total and active communities, and mcrABDG genes were significantly expressed in metatranscriptomic sequences. Fungal genera Absidia, Penicillium, and Rhizopus were dominant in DNA samples, whereas Saccharomycodes, Pichia, Coemansia, and Schizosaccharomyces dominated RNA samples. These fungi can remediate environments contaminated with recalcitrant hydrocarbons. Despite the limited information obtained from fungal functional profile, an in-depth investigation of their activities and interrelation with Archaea and Bacteria in oil reservoirs is crucial for monitoring and mitigating oil biodegradation and pipeline biocorrosion processes.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaFungiMetagenomicsMicrobiotaPetroleumWater MicrobiologyBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBrazilCorrosionHydrocarbonsOil and Gas FieldsPhylogenyHydrocarbonsPetroleumFungiHydrocarbon degradationMeta-omics analysesOil reservoirs microbial communitiesPipeline corrosion

Identifiers

PMID42307846
PMCPMC13275535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.