SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Traumatic brain injury among hispanic children in the United States: a comprehensive systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Hispanic children face disproportionate socioeconomic disadvantage, underinsurance, and language barriers, yet disparities in their TBI outcomes remain under-investigated. This systematic review aims to (1) synthesize existing evidence on the epidemiology, mechanisms of injury, and outcomes of TBI among Hispanic children in the United States; (2) evaluate disparities in healthcare access, diagnostic evaluation, and access to rehabilitation services; and (3) identify gaps in the literature to inform culturally responsive prevention and intervention strategies. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies included those reporting primary data on TBI among Hispanic children (< 18 years) in the United States. Data were synthesized qualitatively given heterogeneity in study design, outcome measures, and population characteristics. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Hispanic children sustained TBIs at younger ages and were disproportionately affected by severe mechanisms of injury, including falls from buildings, motor vehicle accidents, and violence. Helmet use was markedly lower among Hispanic children compared to their White peers. Across studies, Hispanic children exhibited higher rates of mortality (13.3% vs. 8.9% in White children). The payer-related barriers correlated with reduced access to inpatient rehabilitation and higher unmet post-discharge needs. Longitudinal studies demonstrated persistently poorer functional outcomes for Hispanic children, particularly in Spanish-speaking families, underscoring the amplifying role of language discordance. Hispanic children experience cumulative disparities in TBI that span exposure, acute care, and long-term recovery. These inequities are driven by structural determinants, including socioeconomic disadvantage, underinsurance, and language barriers, which transform an acute injury into a chronic disability. Interventions to mitigate these disparities must include culturally tailored prevention strategies, expansion of telemedicine, and integration of bilingual services. Further research is needed to disaggregate Hispanic subgroups and evaluate targeted interventions to achieve equity in pediatric TBI outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307808What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.