ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Supportive care for talquetamab-related dysgeusia in multiple myeloma: mixed-methods evidence, nutrition-focused flowchart, and digital companion concept.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient preferences for treatment‑free intervals in multiple myeloma: mixed‑methods insights on monitoring trade‑offs and supportive care improvements.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTalquetamab (TAL) frequently induces a distinctive dysgeusia that diminishes eating enjoyment, oral intake, and quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Patient-centered, evidence-based nutritional guidance tailored to TAL-related sensory phenotypes is scarce. This mixed-methods study aimed to characterize patient experiences, identify preferred dietary adaptations, and translate these findings into a proposed exploratory clinical workflow and a digital companion support concept for future validation.
methodsA prospective, single-center exploratory mixed-methods study was conducted in talquetamab-treated patients with multiple myeloma who reported new-onset taste change (n = 25). Patient-reported dysgeusia, xerostomia symptoms, dietary experiences, and coping strategies were captured using a structured questionnaire with free-text fields. Taste change and xerostomia were assessed by patient report; objective psychophysical taste testing and sialometry were not performed in this cohort. Free-text responses were analyzed by two independent coders using reflexive thematic analysis with iterative consensus. Quantitative data were summarized descriptively. Integrated findings were translated in interprofessional focus groups into two exploratory supportive-care outputs: a proposed clinical workflow and a digital companion blueprint for future validation.
resultsPatients described heterogeneous and individualized taste disturbances, including reduced or unpleasant perception of sweet flavors, bitter/sour aversions, spice-related mucosal sensitivity, and reduced enjoyment of meals. Patient-reported xerostomia symptoms aggravated intolerance to dry or fibrous foods and impaired swallowing comfort. Frequently reported coping strategies included mild herbs and aroma cues, umami-rich additions, sauce- or soup-based texture modification, temperature and plating adjustments, saliva-supportive measures, and environmental or behavioral strategies. Based on these findings, we developed an exploratory supportive-care workflow incorporating cycle-based symptom screening, prospective use of validated taste assessment where feasible, structured xerostomia and nutritional-risk assessment, phenotype-oriented dietary suggestions, safety escalation, and follow-up. A digital companion blueprint (GUSTABOR) was conceptualized to support future individualized dietary guidance after usability and effectiveness testing.
conclusionsTalquetamab-related dysgeusia is clinically meaningful, heterogeneous, and closely linked to oral dryness symptoms, food texture tolerance, eating enjoyment, and social participation. The proposed workflow and digital companion blueprint should be interpreted as exploratory supportive-care concepts derived from patient-reported experience, not as validated clinical tools. Prospective multicenter studies using validated taste instruments, objective salivary-flow assessment, nutritional endpoints, and implementation outcomes are required before routine clinical adoption. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Structured symptom screening, validated taste assessment where feasible, and individualized nutrition support may help identify patients at risk for reduced intake, weight loss, and impaired quality of life during talquetamab therapy. Digital support could broaden access to tailored guidance, but should be implemented only after prospective evaluation of usability, safety, resource requirements, and clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.