Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307789›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026

Machine learning-assisted high-throughput virtual screening of novel energetic materials.

Jing Yang, Huiran Wang, Luyang Zhang, Zhongyang Li, Wenhan Yu, Luting Xiao, Junxia Guan, Junfang Jia, Yuhao Shi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jing YangDepartment of Chemistry, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan, 063000, China. yjlzddove@163.com.
Huiran WangDepartment of Chemistry, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan, 063000, China.
Luyang ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan, 063000, China.
Zhongyang LiHorton High School, Wolfville, NS, B4P 2R2, Canada.
Wenhan YuFaculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Luting XiaoDepartment of Inorganic Non-Metallic Materials Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300401, China.
Junxia GuanDepartment of Chemistry, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan, 063000, China.
Junfang JiaDepartment of Chemistry, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan, 063000, China.
Yuhao ShiHubei Key Laboratory of Drug Synthesis and Optimization, Jingchu University of Technology, Jingmen, 448000, China. 202411010@jcut.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextHigh-energy density materials (HEDMs) are indispensable for defense and a wide range of industrial applications. A core challenge in their development is achieving an optimal balance between high energy performance and low mechanical sensitivity. Traditional design approaches suffer from low efficiency, high cost, and potential risks. In this work, we propose an integrated strategy combining density functional theory (DFT) and machine learning (ML) to address these issues. Using 4-(1,5-diamino-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)-3-(4,5-diamino-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)-1H-pyrazole as the parent scaffold, we constructed a molecular library of over 10,000 derivatives. A total of 439 representative molecules were selected for property calculation, and five ML algorithms were evaluated. The XGBoost model showed the best predictive performance, with an average test set R

methodsAll quantum chemical calculations were performed at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level using Gaussian 16. Ten key properties were obtained, including heat of detonation (Q), detonation velocity (D), detonation pressure (P), impact sensitivity (H₅₀), gaseous and solid enthalpies of formation (HOFg, HOFs), enthalpy of sublimation (ΔHsub), density (ρ), oxygen balance (OB₁₀₀), and nitrogen content (N). Five machine learning algorithms-Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Decision Tree (DT)-were assessed using five-fold cross-validation. The optimized XGBoost model was used for high-throughput virtual screening of the entire molecular library, and all top candidates were further validated using the same DFT approach.

Indexed as

DFTEnergetic materialsHigh-throughput screeningML

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.