Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307784›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2026

Effects of the herbicide 2,4 D active ingredient and commercial formulations on the early life stages of the amphibian Physalaemus gracilis.

Cristina Bridi, Guilherme Felicioni, Jenifer Eduarda Luterek, Inete Cleide Baú, Flavia Bernardo Chagas, Aline Pompermaier, Carla Alves, Paulo Afonso Hartmann, Marilia Hartmann

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cristina BridiLaboratory of Ecology and Conservation, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, RS, Brazil.
Guilherme FelicioniFisheries Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jenifer Eduarda LuterekLaboratory of Ecology and Conservation, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, RS, Brazil.
Inete Cleide BaúLaboratory of Ecology and Conservation, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, RS, Brazil.
Flavia Bernardo ChagasLaboratory of Ecology and Conservation, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, RS, Brazil.
Aline PompermaierLaboratory of Ecology and Conservation, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, RS, Brazil.
Carla AlvesFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul, Sertão, RS, Brazil.
Paulo Afonso HartmannLaboratory of Ecology and Conservation, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, RS, Brazil.
Marilia HartmannLaboratory of Ecology and Conservation, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, RS, Brazil. marilia.hartmann@uffs.edu.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The herbicide 2,4-D is extensively employed and detected in surface waters, representing a risk for amphibians. Species of the genus Physalaemus, such as P. gracilis, show sensitivity to the compound even at low concentrations. This study compared the toxicity of the active ingredient (D

Indexed as

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidAnuraHerbicidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsBrazilEmbryo, NonmammalianLarva2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidHerbicidesWater Pollutants, Chemical2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acidAnuraecotoxicologyhatchlingpesticide

Identifiers

PMID42307784
PMCPMC13275561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.