ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Diazepam selectively biases approach during threat-reward conflict while sparing reactive avoidance.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Top-down corticostriatal control of adaptive restraint during motivational conflict.Science advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleBenzodiazepines are widely used to treat anxiety; however, their influence on defensive behavior when threats compete with rewards remains unclear.
objectivesHere, we tested the effects of diazepam on reactive avoidance (no conflict), threat-reward conflict resolution, and re-expression of avoidance following conflict.
methodsUsing an integrated platform-mediated avoidance paradigm in female and male rats, we assessed the effects of a low dose systemically administered diazepam (1 mg/kg).
resultsDiazepam did not alter the reactive avoidance memory expression when threat cues were presented without a concurrent reward cue. In contrast, during the cued threat-reward conflict, diazepam reduced platform avoidance and increased reward engagement, shifting the avoidance/approach balance toward the approach. Diazepam also impaired the re-expression of avoidance following conflict training, maintaining a more approach-dominant behavioral allocation. Sex differences emerged selectively during post-conflict re-expression of avoidance, where diazepam produced a clearer shift toward reward engagement in males, whereas the effect in females was weaker and not clearly detectable under the present conditions. Control assays showed no significant effects of diazepam on threat or reward memory retrieval, sucrose intake, open-field locomotion, or anxiety-like behavior.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that diazepam shifts behavioral allocation toward reward during threat-reward conflict and alters post-conflict avoidance re-expression, with effects that were more apparent in males than in females, while sparing reactive avoidance under no-conflict conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.