ArticleClinical neuroradiology2026
Differentiating Hemorrhage and Contrast Extravasation After Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Virtual Non-Contrast Photon-Counting CT.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the early phase after mechanical thrombectomy, differentiating between intracranial hemorrhage and contrast medium extravasation on CT imaging remains a major diagnostic challenge. Both can appear hyperdense on standard CT scans, however, they have significantly different clinical implications, particularly regarding anticoagulation decisions. The Virtual Non-Contrast (VNC) technique using photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT), offers the potential to reliably distinguish between blood and iodine-based contrast material in a single scan by virtually removing the iodine component. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical feasibility and diagnostic performance of the VNC technique in patients after thrombectomy, with focus on the differentiation between hemorrhage and contrast extravasation.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed hyperdense areas of 36 patients who underwent PCCT imaging shortly after mechanical thrombectomy. Two experienced neuroradiologists independently assessed the presence of intracranial hemorrhage and residual contrast extravasation using the VNC datasets. Findings, including measured volumes, were compared to follow-up scans.
resultsVNC imaging enabled reliable differentiation between hemorrhage and contrast staining. The sensitivity for detecting hemorrhage was 0.93 (25 of 27 patients, confidence interval 0.77-0.98), with a specificity of 100%. Contrast extravasation was correctly diagnosed in the 9 remaining cases using both VNC and native CT.
conclusionThe VNC technique using PCCT demonstrates high clinical utility in the early post-thrombectomy setting, offering reliable differentiation between intracranial hemorrhage and contrast extravasation in the majority of cases. However, isolated cases with extensive contrast extravasation or overlapping imaging features may still pose diagnostic limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.