Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307750›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Working conditions in endocrine surgery : A study among participants of the 43rd annual conference of the Surgical Working Group Endocrinology].

Maximilian Kießler, Maximilian Berlet, Anna Mikl, Helmut Friess, Costanza Chiapponi

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maximilian KießlerKlinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Maximilian BerletKlinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Anna MiklKlinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. anna.mikl@tum.de.
Helmut FriessKlinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Costanza ChiapponiKlinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWorking conditions in surgical specialties are increasingly characterized by high workload and growing job dissatisfaction, negatively affecting recruitment, retention, and the long-term sustainability of healthcare services. While extensive data are available for surgery as a whole, working conditions in endocrine surgery as a subspecialty of visceral surgery have not yet been investigated separately. The aim of the present study was, for the first time, to assess job satisfaction, occupational stressors, and working conditions among endocrine surgeons in Germany and to compare these factors according to the extent of endocrine surgical practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn anonymous cross-sectional survey was conducted during the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Surgical Working Group for Endocrinology (CAEK). The standardized questionnaire comprised 28 items addressing sociodemographic characteristics, professional activity, workload, and job satisfaction.

resultsA total of 84 fully completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. Overall, 85% of respondents reported high or very high job satisfaction. Predominant involvement in endocrine surgery was associated with significantly higher overall job satisfaction (OR = 2.78; p = 0.021). Differences were particularly pronounced regarding opportunities for continuing medical education (OR = 4.41; p = 0.001), working time arrangements (OR = 3.21; p = 0.006), and surgical training and professional development (OR = 2.93; p = 0.014). Furthermore, 75% of respondents stated that they would unequivocally choose endocrine surgery again as their specialty. The main sources of occupational burden were bureaucratic and organizational demands. Overall stress levels differed only marginally between groups. The only significant difference was a higher burden from night shifts among surgeons whose endocrine surgical practice constituted a secondary part of their professional activity.

conclusionPhysicians predominantly engaged in endocrine surgery demonstrate significantly higher job satisfaction despite experiencing comparable levels of occupational burden. These findings suggest that specialized clinical profiles, structured training pathways, and favorable working time models contribute substantially to the attractiveness of this field. Promoting specialized training with the goal of subspecialization may therefore represent an important strategy for improving job satisfaction, enhancing recruitment and retention, and ensuring the long-term provision of surgical care in other areas of visceral surgery as well.

Indexed as

Burnout riskJob satisfactionPostgraduate trainingPsychiatric healthSurgical subspecialization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.