Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307740›Full record

ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026

Alopecia areata: current concepts.

Audrey Terrany, Robert A Schwartz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Audrey TerranyRutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Medical Science Building H-574, 07103-2714, Newark, NJ, USA.
Robert A SchwartzRutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Medical Science Building H-574, 07103-2714, Newark, NJ, USA. roschwar@rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3036-3825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune condition characterized by relapsing, non-scarring hair loss. Approximately 80% of patients experience limited patchy hair loss with potential for spontaneous recovery, while others progress to more extensive forms, such as alopecia totalis or alopecia universalis, both of which carry a profound psychosocial burden. Advances in research have identified immune privilege collapse of the hair follicle, Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway activation and genetic predisposition as key mechanisms driving disease onset and progression. These insights have advanced therapeutic strategies, shifting from nonspecific treatment towards targeted interventions. Conventional treatment, including topical agents and light-based approaches, remain important options, particularly for mild or localized disease, while the advent of oral Janus kinase inhibitors, such as baricitinib and ritlecitinib, offers the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved systemic treatment for severe AA. In this review, we summarize current concepts in epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, comorbidities and treatment, highlighting emerging therapies and discussing future directions for improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Autoimmune diseasesDisorders of skin appendagesHair diseasesJanus kinase inhibitorsPsychosocial distress

Identifiers

PMID42307740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.