ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Selecting Pharmacologic Interventions for MASH.
Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is now recognized as the leading cause of cirrhosis, an important risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, and a growing indication for liver transplantation. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently approved two agents for the treatment of MASH in adults who have progressed to moderate-to-advanced hepatic fibrosis: resmetirom and semaglutide. Resmetirom is an oral, once-daily selective thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist that reduces steatohepatitis, promotes fibrosis regression, and improves atherogenic lipid particles. Semaglutide, a once-weekly subcutaneous glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, was originally approved for diabetes but has also demonstrated efficacy in treating MASH and hepatic fibrosis, while also exerting favorable effects on cardiometabolic risk profiles. As both agents are now considered first-line, clinicians face the challenge of selecting the optimal treatment. This review analyzes the pivotal data from the MAESTRO-NASH and ESSENCE trials to compare their contraindications, side effects, and clinical benefits, providing a practical framework for individualizing MASH treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307712What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.