Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307712›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2026

Selecting Pharmacologic Interventions for MASH.

Jason J Pan, Brian H Horwich, Mohamad Chahine, Julio A Gutierrez, Sammy Saab

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason J PanDepartments of Surgery and Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Brian H HorwichDepartments of Surgery and Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mohamad ChahineDepartments of Surgery and Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Julio A GutierrezCenter for Organ Transplant, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sammy SaabDepartments of Surgery and Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Ssaab@mednet.ucla.edus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is now recognized as the leading cause of cirrhosis, an important risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, and a growing indication for liver transplantation. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently approved two agents for the treatment of MASH in adults who have progressed to moderate-to-advanced hepatic fibrosis: resmetirom and semaglutide. Resmetirom is an oral, once-daily selective thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist that reduces steatohepatitis, promotes fibrosis regression, and improves atherogenic lipid particles. Semaglutide, a once-weekly subcutaneous glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, was originally approved for diabetes but has also demonstrated efficacy in treating MASH and hepatic fibrosis, while also exerting favorable effects on cardiometabolic risk profiles. As both agents are now considered first-line, clinicians face the challenge of selecting the optimal treatment. This review analyzes the pivotal data from the MAESTRO-NASH and ESSENCE trials to compare their contraindications, side effects, and clinical benefits, providing a practical framework for individualizing MASH treatment.

Indexed as

Glucagon-Like PeptidesNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHumansSemaglutideGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like PeptidesSemaglutideMASHNASHPharmacological treatmentsSteatosisSteatotic Liver Disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.