ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Factors influencing care for patients with gynecologic malignancies from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: a questionnaire study (iCALD-2).
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCulturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations affected by cancer experience challenges within healthcare systems leading to inequities and disparities in care. This study aimed to describe factors that affect care for gynecologic cancer patients from CALD backgrounds by gathering perspectives from patients, interpreters, and cancer care professionals.
methodsThis questionnaire-based study was conducted in the Gynecologic Oncology Clinics at Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada. Study-specific questionnaires were administered to CALD patients, professional interpreters, and cancer care professionals with domains including demographics, clinic experiences, and perceived barriers and facilitators to care. Descriptive statistics summarized survey results and content analysis of free-text answers was performed.
resultsBetween May 2022 and December 2023, 23 patients, 10 interpreters, and 11 cancer care professionals completed surveys. Twenty (87%) patients reported English proficiency as "poor" or "very poor," but most were confident in participating in treatment decision-making (n = 20, 87%). Most agreed (n = 15, 65%) that interpretive services were beneficial however 12 (52%) preferred family members or bilingual staff to interpret. All interpreters were comfortable facilitating oncology discussions, but eight (80%) had previously been asked by family members to withhold information about cancer diagnosis or prognosis. Ten (91%) cancer care professionals reported interpreters improved care delivery for CALD patients.
conclusionWhile language interpretation is crucial to effective cancer care delivery for CALD patients, factors including family support and patient preferences may impact consultation dynamics and patient experiences. These factors need to be considered upon implementing future interventions to optimize care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.