ArticleBrain topography2026
The Default Mode Network and Behavior: a Model to Analyse Psycho-Physiological Interactions in Resting State fMRI.
Article in Brain topography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Default Mode Network was a key finding for cognitive neuroscience, but being the result of a data-driven analysis of resting-state fMRI data, its psychological and clinical implications have been difficult to elucidate. This is because in the resting-state paradigm we cannot directly correlate an observable specific task with specific brain connectivity patterns, and therefore inferences about the relationship between particular cognitive domains and the resting-state networks are limited. A similar problem arises when trying to link the network with personality traits: the DMN, as other intrinsic networks, is not a simple metric to compare with the results of a psychological test, but a complex composite of spatio-temporal features. Although over the last two decades several research works have provided insights about these relationships, we still lack a consensus on the methodology that best captures these interactions. In this context, we propose an alternative method to model the psycho-physiological relationships of the resting state components with behavioral data, based on the dimensionality reduction of an extensive psychological evaluation and the spatial dimension of the intrinsic connectivity components. Our results show that the connectivity networks are low to moderately related with behavioral and personality traits, or at least this relation is not in a direct way. This integration of neuroimaging and psychological assessment data creates valuable pathways for cognitive neuroscience, potentially revealing with precision how intrinsic brain network organization relates to individual variations in cognitive functioning and personality dimensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.