ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Risk factors associated with the occurrence of African swine fever in Benin.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
African swine fever (ASF) is a highly contagious viral disease affecting pigs that cause high mortality and threatens the swine industry. In Benin where the virus was first identified in 1997, epidemiological data remain limited. This study assessed potential factors associated with reported ASF occurrence in pig farms in southern Benin using 42 questions survey administered to 215 pig farms. Data collected followed descriptive and logistic regression analyses. Of the surveyed farms, 100 reported at least one ASF outbreak between 1998 and 2020. Univariate analysis identified several risk factors, including raising local pigs (OR = 2.4), urban farm location (OR = 2.09), purchasing pigs for herd renewal (OR = 1.93), and the presence of ticks (OR = 2.34). Protective factors included farm with a fence (OR = 0.44), gates (OR = 0.53), restricted farm access (OR = 0,5), raising improved pigs (OR = 0.42), confinement system (OR = 0.32), on-site staff (OR = 0.24), and daily slurry collection (OR = 0.45). Multivariate analysis showed that purchasing pigs for herd renewal was the primary risk factor (OR = 3.25), while tick presence on farms (adjusted OR = 2.197) remained positively associated and daily slurry collection (OR = 0.378) was protective. These results indicate that animal introduction practices and farm hygiene are key drivers of ASF risk. Strengthening biosecurity particularly controlling pig purchases and improving sanitation can significantly reduce ASF occurrence in southern Benin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.