ArticleRevista de saude publica2026
Differences in the microenvironment for leisure physical activity and commuting in São Paulo.
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the characteristics of the built environment at the micro-scale and to examine differences according to residential area and social and demographic variables among adults in São Paulo, Brazil.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study involving 1,434 adults from the ISA-Physical Activity and Environment cohort. Environmental characteristics were assessed using the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS Global) method based on Google Earth images along 400-700-meter routes centered on the participants' georeferenced addresses. For the analysis, Mann-Whitney U tests were used for two independent groups and Kruskal-Wallis tests for three or more groups, followed by Dunn's post-hoc test, to assess differences in mean scores by health coordination unit, sex, age, educational level, and skin color.
resultsThe surroundings of residences in the Central-West region had the highest overall scores (p < 0.001). Individuals with higher education levels, who self-identified as White or Asian, and those aged 60 years or older resided in areas with better scores for aesthetics, social aspects, presence of trees, canopy cover, sidewalks, intersections, and overall environmental score (p < 0.001). In contrast, people with lower educational attainment and those who self-identified as Black or Brown lived in areas with poorer sidewalk conditions (p < 0.001).
conclusionIt is concluded that micro-scale conditions were better in the vicinity of residences in central regions and for individuals with higher education, White or Asian skin color, and older age, highlighting the need for public policies aimed at more equitable and inclusive urban planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.