ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2026
Accuracy and Prognosis of Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Brazilian Adults - ELSA-Brasil Study.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), defined by increased left ventricular mass, is an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Evidence suggests that LVH identified by electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiography represents distinct entities with potentially different prognostic implications.
objectivesAssess the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiographic criteria for LVH compared with transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and to evaluate their predictive value for fatal cardiovascular outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy analysis and a prospective follow-up within the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. LVH on ECG was defined by Minnesota Code criteria, and LVH on TTE by increased calculated left ventricular mass. Significance level was defined at 0,05.
resultsAmong 2,849 participants (43.6% male), median age 62 years, 12.5% had LVH by TTE and 5.9% by ECG criteria. ECG-defined LVH showed, from different criteria, very low sensitivity (5-12%) but high specificity (95-99%) compared with TTE. In prognostic analyses, TTE-defined LVH was associated with significant fatal adverse cardiovascular events (FMACE) (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.7-5.9). ECG-defined LVH also predicted FMACE, with HR close to 3.5 across the different MC criteria in multivariate regression analysis. The predictive capacity remained significant after further adjustment for hypertrophy defined by either of the methods.
conclusionsAlthough electrocardiographic criteria demonstrated poor diagnostic accuracy for LVH compared with TTE, both modalities were independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. These findings suggest that ECG-defined and TTE-defined LVH provide complementary prognostic information and may reflect distinct pathophysiological processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.