ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Development of a novel, urine-based high-risk human papillomavirus polymerase chain reaction test to predict cervical intraepithelial neoplasia abnormalities associated with cervical cancer.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated and optimized a novel urine-based workflow using high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to detect 14 hrHPV genotypes linked to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) abnormalities for cervical cancer screening. In cohort 1 for clinical feasibility, 82 women with confirmed CIN2+ abnormalities provided paired urine and cervical brush samples before treatment. Urine was tested with the novel hrHPV workflow, and cervical brushes with the Cobas HPV Test (Roche). For Ct cut-off optimization in cohort 2, urine samples from 983 women in a primary screening, triage, and follow-up program were analyzed, optimizing CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity by varying the 12-other hrHPV channel Ct cut-off from 28.0 to 38.0, while maintaining HPV16/18 Ct cut-offs at 38.0. In cohort 1, the urine hrHPV test showed 92.7% sensitivity for CIN2+ and 93.9% for CIN3+, exceeding cervical brush sensitivities of 78.1% and 90.9%, respectively. In cohort 2, the 12-other hrHPV Ct altered CIN2+ sensitivity from 76.6% to 93.6% and specificity from 83.1% to 75%. ROC analysis identified optimal cut-offs at 32.76 for CIN2+ and 30.47 for CIN3+. The proposed cut-offs are HPV16/18 at 38.0, and 12 other hrHPV at 33.0 for maximum sensitivity (93.62% CIN2+, 90.91% CIN3+) or at 30.5 for balanced performance (89.36% CIN2+ sensitivity, 80% specificity). The urine-based hrHPV test uses 40 mL of urine collected using a standard urine collection device, and demonstrated high sensitivity for CIN2+ prediction. Adjustable Ct thresholds allow tailored performance optimization, thereby enhancing accessibility, adherence, and early cervical cancer detection across diverse clinical settings.IMPORTANCEA novel urine-based high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) polymerase chain reaction test was developed to detect 14 hrHPV genotypes, including individual HPV16 and HPV18 typing, associated with cervical cancer progression. By employing a liquid-liquid separation method to extract DNA from large-volume (40 mL) pot-collected urine samples, the test demonstrated sensitivities of 92.7% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) and 93.9% for CIN3+. Optimization of cycle threshold cut-offs yielded 93% sensitivity and 77% specificity for predicting CIN2+ in an enriched population. It can enhance accessibility, compliance, and early detection across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.