Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307244›Full record

ArticlemBio2026

A call to expand the dimensions of halide-philicity.

Lawrence P Wackett, Randy B Stockbridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lawrence P WackettDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3255-1101
Randy B StockbridgeDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8848-3032

Funding

Structural and functional analysis of novel microbial membrane proteinsR35GM128768 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Randy B. Stockbridge · 2018 to 2026
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiology research has historically associated the term halophily with sodium chloride. Today, other halides are taking on increasing importance with the broader use of other halide anions, their oxyanions, and thousands of organohalides. This has led to a wider and human-altered distribution of halides and organohalides in the environment, as well as increased efforts to bioengineer microbes to synthesize or degrade organohalides and to tolerate their associated halide salts. In this context, it needs to be more widely appreciated that microbial responses to fluorine, chlorine, bromine, or iodine are vastly different. Moreover, the way microbes handle a given halide may differ when they are paired with different counter cations. In addition, the microbial responses may differ when the halogens are in the external environment or liberated inside the cell by cytoplasmic enzymes, for example, by dehalogenases. In this commentary, we seek to highlight these differences and offer a call for future research.

Indexed as

BacteriaHalogensSodium ChlorideHalogensSodium Chloridebacteriahalidehalophilemicroorganismsorganohalidesaltstress

Identifiers

PMID42307244
PMCPMC13343859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.