Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307230›Full record

ArticleJournal of X-ray science and technology2026

Improving the robustness of radiomic features to patient size variations in CBCT imaging for radiotherapy.

Farhang Bayat, Cem Altunbas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of X-ray science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Farhang BayatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Cem AltunbasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Improving quantitative accuracy and tissue visualization in CBCT guided radiation therapyR01CA245270 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ALTUNBAS, CEM · 2020 to 2025
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA245270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundRadiomic feature extraction from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in radiotherapy has potential for predicting tumor control and treatment-related toxicity. However, the reliability of CBCT-based radiomics is limited by variations in scatter intensity associated with differences in patient size.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of patient size on CBCT-derived radiomic features and investigate whether a novel quantitative CBCT technique can reduce patient size-induced radiomic feature variability.MethodsPhantoms representing small and large body habitus were scanned using a linac-mounted CBCT incorporating a two-dimensional antiscatter grid (CBCT-2DASG) and standard clinical protocols. Ninety-three intensity and texture features were extracted from CBCT and multidetector CT (MDCT) images, and robust features were identified by analyzing the concordance correlation between small and large phantom images.ResultsCompared with MDCT, 53% of CBCT-2DASG features were robust to patient size variation, versus 8 features from standard CBCT. The CBCT-2DASG reduced size-dependent feature variation, approximately fourfold on average for intensity-based features, with improvement varying across feature types.ConclusionsCBCT-2DASG with effective scatter suppression reduces patient size-dependent radiomic feature variability in phantom experiments, improving the robustness of CBCT-derived features to patient size variation. This represents a promising step toward more reliable CBCT-based radiomics in radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Body SizeCone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiomicsHumansPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of Resultsimage qualityquantitative CBCTradiomicsradiotherapy response monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42307230
PMCPMC13503152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.