Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307182›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Early Prediction Model for Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Placental and Neonatal Risk Factors.

Salma El Emrani, Frank Doornkamp, Jelle J Goeman, Ewout W Steyerberg, Esther J S Jansen, Jacqueline U M Termote, Enrico Lopriore, Nicoline E Schalij-Delfos, Lotte E van der Meeren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Salma El EmraniDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frank DoornkampDepartment of Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jelle J GoemanDepartment of Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Esther J S JansenDepartment of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Department of Women and Neonate, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline U M TermoteDepartment of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Department of Women and Neonate, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Enrico LoprioreDepartment of Neonatology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nicoline E Schalij-DelfosDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lotte E van der MeerenDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Existing prediction models for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) primarily focus on screening reduction which occur 5 to 7 weeks after birth. We hypothesized that high-risk neonates could be identified much earlier if placental and early postnatal risk factors are incorporated, so that this high risk can be considered during neonatal treatment well before ROP screening begins. Methods: We included 591 neonates born ≤32 weeks of gestational age (GA) and/or birthweight (BW) ≤1500 grams. Data were retrospectively collected, and placentas were examined for histological abnormalities. The "Placenta as an Additional Predictor for ROP" (PAPROP) model included: GA, BW, mechanical ventilation, postnatal corticosteroids, severe histological chorioamnionitis, and distal villous hypoplasia. This model was internally validated with five-fold cross-validation and compared to a reference model using only GA and BW. Results: The PAPROP model had a discriminatory ability between ROP presence and absence of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76-0.86) compared to 0.78 in the reference GA&BW model. This model had a sensitivity of 0.97 and specificity of 0.44 in the test set (threshold 10%). Using clinically relevant thresholds of 10% to 15%, implementing this model in the second postnatal week could lead to a 25% reduction in ROP screenings without missing stage 2 and severe ROP. Conclusions: The PAPROP model has a high ability to predict ROP development at the end of the second postnatal week, has a potential high clinical utility, and is likely cost-effective. After further external validation, it may aid in creating a personalized neonatal treatment approach for ROP prevention in high-risk neonates.

Indexed as

PlacentaRetinopathy of PrematurityBirth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningPrediction AlgorithmsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID42307182
PMCPMC13284914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.