Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307065›Full record

Observational studyClinical transplantation2026

Management of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections With Oral Antibiotics in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Olubusola Fowowe, Taylor Morrisette, Aaron Hamby, Krutika Mediwala Hornback, Kelsey Coffman, Lindsay Deloney, Rodericks Fobbs, Alexandra Mills, Courtney Harris, Rachel Burgoon

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olubusola FowoweMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4743-855X
Taylor MorrisetteMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1094-043X
Aaron HambyMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2600-7393
Krutika Mediwala HornbackMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3982-2103
Kelsey CoffmanMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-0922
Lindsay DeloneyMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7571-4492
Rodericks FobbsMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1691-5817
Alexandra MillsMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4473-8096
Courtney HarrisMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-0670
Rachel BurgoonMUSC College of Pharmacy, MUSC College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3291-7174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransitioning from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotics upon clinical stability in gram-negative rod (GNR) bloodstream infections (BSI) in immunocompetent patients is effective, with comparable clinical success rates as IV therapy. Studies have historically excluded solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. This study aims to describe the clinical outcomes of SOT patients who transitioned to oral therapy to manage GNR BSIs.

methodsThis retrospective observational cohort was conducted at the Medical University of South Carolina Health between January 2018 and August 2023. SOT recipients 18 years or older with a positive monomicrobial GNR blood culture and a susceptible oral agent were included. The primary outcome was composite clinical success, encompassing the absence of 30-day mortality, microbiology recurrence, or worsening symptoms without therapy modification.

resultsTwo hundred and one patients were screened, with 60 meeting the criteria for analysis. The median age was 58 (IQR 50-67) years, 56.7% were male, and 70% had a kidney transplant. The most common causative pathogen was Escherichia coli (58.3%), and the most frequently used oral agents were fluoroquinolones (90.0%). The primary outcome of clinical success was achieved in 90% of patients. The median duration of total therapy was 14 (IQR 13-14) days, which included 4 (IQR 3-5) days of IV therapy and 10 (IQR 8-11) days of oral therapy.

conclusionThis study outlines our institutional experience with transitioning to oral therapy to manage gram-negative BSI in SOT recipients, demonstrating high clinical success rates. Larger prospective studies in this population are necessary to substantiate and validate our findings.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsOrgan TransplantationTransplant RecipientsAdministration, OralAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbloodstream infectionsgram‐negative bacteremiaoral antibioticssolid organ transplant

Identifiers

PMID42307065
PMCPMC13274329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.