ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2026
Integrating cross-omics research through FAIR Digital Objects with DataPLANT.
Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing cross-domain integration and semantic technologies: proceedings of the 19th international symposium on integrative bioinformatics.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In plant sciences, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics generate large complex datasets which require structured metadata in order to make them interoperable and reproducible. In this work, we demonstrate how the Annotated Research Context (ARC) can be used for the management of such data using a barley single-cell RNA sequencing dataset integrated with spatial transcriptomics data. Experimental metadata was captured in ISA tables using ontology annotations to ensure machine readability and interpretability. The computational analyses were wrapped as Common Workflow Language (CWL) scripts to ensure reproducibility of the results and reusability of both the data and the analysis pipeline. The ARC links input materials unambiguously to the analysis results, allowing the research community to trace the entire investigation procedure. Our use case shows the benefits of using an ARC for structuring and annotating heterogeneous data, enabling comparative analyses across different datasets. While wrapping analysis scripts with CWL required some technical knowledge, the resulting standardized and reusable workflows outweigh this entry barrier. Parameter variations can be easily tested and results linked correctly without manual editing of the workflows themselves. Overall, this work highlights how using the ARC framework for single-cell datasets improves the FAIRness of the data and increases the reusability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.