Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306961›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2026

Reclassification of

Lama Abujamous, Rozaimi Razali, Hamda Al-Thawadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lama AbujamousDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; Office of Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Rozaimi RazaliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Hamda Al-ThawadiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpreting BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in underrepresented populations presents significant challenges due to the scarcity of ancestry-matched reference data, which can lead to an overestimation of variant rarity. This study evaluates the effectiveness of employing ancestry-stratified allele frequencies, including a subset from the Middle East, within a calibrated ACMG/AMP framework to enhance the interpretation of BRCA1 VUS. We analyzed 626 BRCA1 variants from ClinVar, comprising 608 missense, 15 splice-altering, and 3 nonsense variants categorized as VUS or "not provided." Variants were annotated using gnomAD v4 (both global and ancestry-stratified subsets) and dbNSFP, and subsequently evaluated according to workflows aligned with ACMG/AMP and ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1/2 guidelines, with cross-validation performed using the Bayesian point system. Our findings revealed that ten variants (1.6%) were reclassified. Nine missense variants were downgraded to benign or likely benign status based on BS1 and BP1 criteria; notably, none of these downgrades would have occurred if evaluated solely on global gnomAD allele frequencies. Among these, five downgrades relied on the Middle East subset, while four depended on other ancestry-stratified subgroups. Additionally, one splice-altering variant (rs1555582723) was upgraded to likely pathogenic status based on PVS1_Very Strong and PM2_Supporting criteria. In conclusion, utilizing ancestry-aware population data modestly improved the resolution of BRCA1 VUS, primarily through benign downgrades. This underscores the necessity for larger regional datasets and further functional or case-based evidence to enhance variant interpretation.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinGene FrequencyGenetic VariationBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMiddle EastBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID42306961
PMCPMC13667991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.