Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306930›Full record

ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026

Enhancement of Bond Strength, Degree of Conversion and Biocompatibility In Vitro Using a Hollow Glass Fiber Post With an Optical Illuminator in the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.

Laís Carolina Landim Gomes, Leonardo Jiro Nomura Nakano, Lilian de Siqueira, Juliana Dos Santos Lupp, Luana Marotta Reis de Vasconcellos, Tarcisio José de Arruda Paes Junior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laís Carolina Landim GomesCollege of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5765-7623
Leonardo Jiro Nomura NakanoDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lilian de SiqueiraFederal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-3312
Juliana Dos Santos LuppDepartment of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luana Marotta Reis de VasconcellosDepartment of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tarcisio José de Arruda Paes JuniorDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8446-0474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate an optical fiber illuminator associated with a hollow glass post on resin cement's adhesive, physicochemical, and biological properties. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo enhance light transmission throughout the root canal, a photopolymerization optical fiber device was developed. Eighty bovine teeth were distributed into five groups (n = 16): CD (Commercial post, Allcem dual-cured cement); PL (Hollow post, Allcem light-cured cement); PD (Hollow post, Allcem dual-cured cement); POL (Optical illuminator, hollow post, Allcem light-cured cement); POD (Optical illuminator, hollow post, Allcem dual-cured cement). About 2 mm slices (n = 12) from cervical, middle, and apical thirds underwent a push-out bond test, fracture analysis, conversion of monomer degree (DC%), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and MTT cytotoxicity. Micro-CT (n = 4) evaluated the cementation interface.

resultsApical third exhibited higher adhesive strength compared to the middle third (p < 0.001). Fiber optic lighting with a hollow glass fiber post and dual-cured cement (POD) from apical showed the highest bond strength and DC%. EDS proved suitable chemical components. Hollow glass fiber post and dual-cured cement (PD) from apical exhibited higher cell viability compared to commercial post (p < 0.001). Micro-CT with 3D reconstruction evidenced the excellent adaptation of the post.

conclusionThe illuminator device efficiently improved cement's adhesive strength, degree of conversion for the dual-cured cement, especially in the apical third, and enhanced the biocompatibility of the proposed system. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This novel optical device enhances light transmission within the root canal, improving post bonding and potentially leading to better clinical outcomes in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsDental BondingGlassPost and Core TechniqueTooth, NonvitalAnimalsCattleIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingPolymersResin CementsSilicon DioxideBiocompatible MaterialsfiberglassPolymersResin CementsSilicon Dioxideadhesioncytotoxicitydental curing lightsintraradicular postresin cement

Identifiers

PMID42306930
PMCPMC13576820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.