Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306871›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescence2026

Adolescents' Long-Term Identity Tension After Politicized Cyber Shaming: Peer Support and Behavioural Visibility Management As Joint Conditions.

Linsen Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Linsen YangThe University of Sydney, School of Languages and Cultures, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9029-0871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoliticized cyber shaming recodes adolescents' cultural interests as evidence of political loyalty or moral belonging. This study examines how such shaming is associated with longer-term identity tension in adolescence, focusing on public expression, peer belonging, and self-evaluation after politicized online controversy.

methodsData were collected in China in 2023 using an event-anchored retrospective mixed-methods design. The study combines front-end data from Baidu Tieba, a Chinese topic-based online forum, during the 2012 Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands dispute and the 2016 Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) controversy, with a retrospective survey of 84 participants exposed as adolescents and timeline interviews with 18 participants. At event exposure, participants were 14-18 years old (M = 16.06, SD = 1.40), and 63.1% were women.

resultsThe controversy windows showed higher semantic hostility and first-screen nationalist dominance than historical baselines. Adaptation was organised into limited expression, circle contraction, and public silence. Public silence showed the highest long-term identity tension and perceived negative impact, circle contraction was intermediate, and limited expression was lowest. Peer support was associated with lower identity tension overall, behavioural visibility management with higher identity tension, and their interaction indicated joint association with adaptation.

conclusionsPoliticized cyber shaming should be understood as an identity-relevant social-evaluative experience in adolescence. Support may reduce isolation, but it does not simply cancel harm when continued participation requires sustained visibility management.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorCyberbullyingPeer GroupSocial IdentificationSocial SupportAdolescentChinaFemaleHumansMalePoliticizationRetrospective StudiesadolescenceChinaidentity tensionpeer supportpoliticized cyber shamingvisibility management

Identifiers

PMID42306871
PMCPMC13440694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.