Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306832›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026

Subsidy Schemes to Alleviate the Burden of Travelling for Healthcare: A Brief Report on Users' Experiences in Queensland, Australia.

Leah Zajdlewicz, Belinda C Goodwin, Emma Pearse, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Elizabeth A Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Subsidy Schemes to Alleviate the Burden of Travelling for Healthcare: A Brief Report on Users' Experiences in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah ZajdlewiczViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7175-6909
Belinda C GoodwinViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3425-4848
Emma PearseViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4232-3267
Fiona Crawford-WilliamsCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-333X
Elizabeth A JohnstonViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9486-5704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedFor people in rural and remote areas, government-funded travel subsidy schemes provide vital financial assistance and equitable access to specialist healthcare in city centres. However, few studies have examined users' experiences of these schemes.

methodsAdults travelling for healthcare in Queensland, Australia, completed an online survey capturing their most recent experience applying for the Patient Travel Subsidy Scheme (PTSS). Participants' responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

resultsFrom 69 respondents (aged 29-80 years, 60% female, 88% most recent application for cancer-related care), 57% agreed information about the scheme was easy to access, although only 39% found the initial registration process easy. Most indicated that local hospital staff and PTSS officers were knowledgeable and helpful (65%-70%). Less agreed that staff were available to assist (48%) or that processes were well-coordinated across hospitals (42%). Of those who sought reimbursement for travel costs (75%), almost two-thirds (63%) were out-of-pocket post-reimbursement (mean = AU$725; range = AU$20-10 000). Delayed reimbursement was relatively common (60%) and contributed to financial hardship (36%). For some (13%), challenges accessing the scheme impacted treatment decisions. User feedback included improved visibility of online application and reimbursement status, and fast-tracking of high-risk, urgent and ongoing cases.

conclusionsWhile information about the scheme and interactions with frontline staff were viewed positively by most, several system-level challenges remain. SO WHAT?: Substantial out-of-pocket costs and reimbursement delays contribute to financial hardship and can affect treatment decisions. Increased subsidy reflecting actual travel costs, timely reimbursement, fast-tracking, and greater application assistance and coordination would improve user experiences.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentHealth Services AccessibilityTravelAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQueenslandSurveys and Questionnairesfinancial supporthealth equityhealth servicesregional and remoterural health

Identifiers

PMID42306832
PMCPMC13273579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.