ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Artificial intelligence-assisted early screening of lung cancer and accurate diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: research progress and clinical prospects from radiomics to multi-omics integration: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Although low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has improved early detection, false-positive results, overdiagnosis, and interobserver variability continue to limit screening efficiency and downstream management of pulmonary nodules. This narrative review summarizes recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted screening, radiomics-based nodule characterization, and multi-omics integration for the precision diagnosis of lung cancer. Methods: A narrative review with thematic analysis was conducted using representative literature on AI-assisted lung cancer screening, quantitative imaging analysis of pulmonary nodules, radiogenomic and multi-omics integration, and clinical translation challenges. Studies were synthesized to highlight technical advances, diagnostic performance, strengths, limitations, and barriers to implementation. Key Content and Findings: AI improves nodule detection, second-reader support, workflow efficiency, and malignancy-risk estimation in LDCT screening. Radiomics converts CT images into quantitative features that can improve discrimination between benign and malignant nodules, especially when combined with clinical variables or deep-learning models. Beyond imaging alone, radiogenomic and other multi-omics approaches link imaging phenotypes with molecular alterations, treatment response, and prognosis, thereby supporting more individualized management. However, current evidence remains limited by dataset heterogeneity, retrospective design, limited interpretability, and insufficient multicenter prospective validation. Conclusions: AI-based imaging and multi-omics integration offer a promising pathway toward earlier detection and more precise diagnosis of lung cancer. Broader clinical adoption will depend on standardized data acquisition, robust external validation, interpretable models, and careful governance of privacy, ethics, and workflow integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.