Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306693›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026

Advances in surgical treatment for valvular heart disease: a narrative review of 2025 studies.

Jiaqi Wu, Ming Chen, Chen Jiang, Xingyu Qian, Keqing Yu, Yidan Zheng, Pengning Fan, Yuqi Liu, Jiu Pu, Lin Fan and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jiaqi Wu *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ming Chen *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chen JiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xingyu QianDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Keqing YuSchool of Foreign Languages, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, China.
Yidan ZhengDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Pengning FanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuqi LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jiu PuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Lin FanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhe ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Haoyang ZhaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhengfeng FanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jian SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Teng ZengDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zihao ZhouDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Li Xu *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Fei Li *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The field of surgical treatment for valvular heart disease (VHD) has progressed rapidly in 2025. This review aims to summarize the year's key research, focusing on comparisons of mainstream techniques for aortic, mitral, and tricuspid valve diseases, innovations in repair techniques, and advances in emerging technologies, to provide evidence-based support for individualized clinical decision-making. Methods: A structured search of PubMed database was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), registry studies, and meta-analyses published in 2025, and the evidence was synthesized narratively. Key Content and Findings: In the aortic valve arena, long-term follow-up from the PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk trials confirmed the non-inferiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in low-risk patients. However, real-world data suggested higher long-term risks with TAVR in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) and younger patients, whereas women demonstrated greater benefit. The indication for early intervention in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) was reinforced. Aortic valve repair and the Ross procedure accumulated more robust evidence for long-term survival and quality of life in younger patients. In the mitral valve domain, the MITRACURE study highlighted gaps between real-world practice and guidelines, including delayed referral and suboptimal repair rates for mitral regurgitation (MR). The advantages of repair for degenerative disease were further solidified, though techniques for posterior leaflet prolapse and management strategies for atrial functional regurgitation (AFMR) require optimization. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) was increasingly used in high-risk patients but yielded inferior long-term outcomes compared to surgery, and surgical rescue after failed TEER carried high risk. For the tricuspid valve, comparative effectiveness of transcatheter Conclusions: The 2025 evidence reinforces a paradigm shift from risk-score-based decision-making toward individualized valve care. Transcatheter techniques have expanded their indications, but surgery remains irreplaceable in young, low-risk, and BAV patients, as well as in degenerative MR. Real-world gaps in guideline adherence, delayed referral, and suboptimal repair rates require urgent attention. Emerging technologies show early promise, although their long term durability and clinical value await further validation.

Indexed as

aortic valvemitral valvetricuspid valveValvular heart disease (VHD)

Identifiers

PMID42306693
PMCPMC13266806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.