ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Progress on the mechanism of Piezo1 in mechanical ventilation-induced lung injury.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) causes 40-45% mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) despite lung-protective ventilation. Current therapies remain empirical, lacking mechanistic understanding of how cells transduce mechanical forces into pathological responses. The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 has emerged as a critical mechanotransducer, yet exhibits a fundamental paradox: endothelial Piezo1 deletion worsens edema while excessive activation disrupts barriers and triggers inflammatory cell death. Conventional "protective versus injurious" frameworks cannot explain these opposing outcomes. We propose the "Context-Dependent Rheostat" model, wherein Piezo1 outcomes depend on mechanical dose, cellular context, and inflammatory milieu. This review synthesizes evidence demonstrating that Piezo1 responses exhibit quantitative inflection points rather than fixed directional effects, with temporal dynamics, cell-type-specific thresholds, and inflammatory priming determining functional transitions. Specifically, endothelial cells preserve barrier integrity within a wider strain tolerance window, whereas epithelial cells exhibit substantially narrower damage thresholds; acute stretch activates protective chromatin remodeling, while sustained ventilation drives ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related/checkpoint kinase 1 (ATR/Chk1)-mediated genomic collapse and cellular senescence. Beyond cell-autonomous responses, macrophages emerge as candidate signal-hub cells integrating mechanosensory inputs from endothelial, epithelial, and neutrophil compartments, representing a high-value therapeutic node. This framework fundamentally reframes VILI therapeutics from global Piezo1 modulation toward precision interventions: temporal stage-specific targeting, context-specific threshold resetting, and biomarker-guided stratification. Candidate strategies span nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) activators for early-phase cytoprotection, Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) antagonism, and ATR/Chk1 inhibitors or senolytic combinations for late-phase intervention, guided by circulating DNA-damage marker γH2AX and senescence-associated secretory phenotype markers. We provide a translational roadmap enabling VILI therapy to transition from empirical ventilation adjustment toward mechanistically-guided precision medicine with actionable intervention points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.