ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Robotic mitral valve repair in octogenarians: safety and clinical outcomes compared with younger patients.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robotic mitral valve (MV) repair has evolved as a minimally invasive surgical approach for mitral regurgitation (MR). However, evidence regarding its safety and clinical outcomes in octogenarians remains limited. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility and early outcomes of robotic MV repair in octogenarians compared with younger patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent totally endoscopic robotic MV repair for MR between September 2019 and September 2024 at Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine. Both degenerative and functional MR were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to age: octogenarians (≥80 years) and younger patients (≤65 years). Preoperative characteristics, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were compared. Postoperative physical function in older patients was evaluated using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Results: Among 170 robotic MV repair cases, 16 patients were aged ≥80 years and 101 patients were aged ≤65 years. Older patients had a higher prevalence of hypertension [14 (88%) Conclusions: Robotic MV repair in carefully selected octogenarians was feasible and associated with favorable early clinical outcomes. Concomitant procedures could be safely performed without deterioration of postoperative physical performance. Robotic MV surgery may represent a reasonable treatment option for older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.