ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Predicting pulmonary nodule growth from a single time point: a fusion model of radiomics and deep learning to optimize follow-up strategies.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growth of pulmonary nodules is an important predictor of malignancy. Their varied size makes them difficult to detect and monitor, and improper management may result in a high risk of malignancy. This study explores a non-invasive method for analyzing growth progression in pulmonary nodules between baseline and follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans. The approach integrates radiomics and deep features extracted from baseline imaging data. These features led to the development of a nodule growth prediction model to accurately differentiate growth status, thus providing an objective, quantitative basis for optimizing clinical follow-up strategies. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with pulmonary nodules who underwent ≥2 chest CT examinations between 2021 and 2024, comprising 1,387 nodules (1,109 for internal training and 278 for internal testing) from baseline and follow-up CT scans. Nodules were classified into growth (volume increase ≥25%) and non-growth groups based on 1-year follow-up volumetric changes. From CT images, 2,264 radiomics features were extracted. Feature selection was conducted via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction. For deep feature extraction, we utilized a Swin Transformer architecture for nodule classification, extracting features from its penultimate layer which similarly underwent PCA-based dimensionality reduction. The extracted radiomics and deep features were integrated to develop logistic regression (LR) and random forest predictive models. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and additional metrics. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves further evaluated clinical utility. Results: The combined model demonstrated strong predictive performance in predicting nodule growth in the Internal training set (n=1,109 nodules). It achieved an AUC of 0.902 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.876-0.929], with a sensitivity of 0.815 and a specificity of 0.837, indicating a robust balance in diagnostic performance. The model significantly surpassed both radiomics-based (AUC =0.829; P<0.001) and deep learning-based (AUC =0.875; P<0.01) benchmarks. Furthermore, decision curve and calibration analyses consistently validated its clinical superiority and prediction accuracy. Conclusions: The integrated radiomics and deep learning model effectively stratifies pulmonary nodule growth risk. This approach provides clinicians with a quantitative tool for personalizing follow-up and intervention strategies, demonstrating significant potential for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.