ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
Stress distribution in endodontically treated hypertaurodont mandibular 2
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This article evaluates the stress distribution in endodontically treated hypertaurodont mandibular 2 Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography data of a mandibular second molar exhibiting hypertaurodontism were used to generate a three-dimensional tooth model using MIMICS 9.0 software developed by Materialise. The solid model obtained was imported into ANSYS 14.0 developed by ANSYS, Inc. to create the geometric design and finite element mesh. For model development and refinement, SolidWorks and Blender Foundation software were also utilized. Based on the restorative material used to fill the elongated root canal space, three finite element models were developed: Model 1 Gutta-percha (GP) + Endocrown, Model 2 Ribbond + Endocrown, and Model 3 EverX Posterior + Endocrown. A vertical load of 350 N was applied to the functional cusps of all three models and the resulting stress patterns were analyzed. Results: FE model 3, restored with EverX Posterior + Endocrown, exhibited the lowest stress values, followed by the Ribbond-reinforced model 2. The highest stress concentration was observed in the Gutta percha + Endocrown model. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this FEA study, it can be concluded that hypertaurodont teeth with Endocrown as definative restorations demonstrated superior 26 biomechanical behavior when restored intraradicularly with EverX Posterior followed by Ribbond and the one with GP showed the least favorable stress distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.