Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306610›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026

Newly developed universal supra-nano spherical filled resin composite in posterior teeth.

Ebaa Alagha, Yagoub Dhafer Alyami, Salwa Taibah, Hend El Sayed, Shaimaa F K Habib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ebaa AlaghaDepartment of Dental Restorative, Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Vision Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Yagoub Dhafer AlyamiDepartment of Dental Restorative, Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Vision Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Salwa TaibahDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Vision Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hend El SayedDepartment of Restorative and Prosthodontic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shaimaa F K HabibDepartment of Restorative and Prosthodontic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Context: There has been a tremendous leap in resin composite technology over the last two decades. "The rapid pace of product development means that detailed clinical data on individual materials are often limited, even when improved versions are regularly introduced". This clinical investigation examined the effectiveness of a recently created resin composite for back teeth, which is universal supra-nano spherical filled, using revised United States Public Health Service (USPHS) standards. Aims: In order to conduct a clinical evaluation and comparison of two resin composites - Omnichroma, a universal supra-nano spherical filled resin composite, and Harmonize, a universal nanohybrid composite resin in Class I posterior restorations over the course of 6 months. Materials and Methods: A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted in 50 patients, each requiring two Class I occlusal restorations. In each patient, one cavity was restored with a universal supra-nano spherical composite resin (Omnichroma, Statistical Analysis Used: Frequencies and percentages were calculated, and Fisher's exact test was used for intergroup comparisons at each recall interval. Results: A 100% recall at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months was achieved since all 50 patients were present at every recall session. When it came to clinical performance, both Omnichroma and Harmonize were on par. values of Bravo (clinically acceptable) and Alpha (excellent) were given to the majority of restorations, while no Charlie (failure) values were recorded. For each memory metric, there were no statistically significant differences between the two materials ( Conclusions: Within the 6-month follow-up period, Omnichroma and Harmonize composite resins demonstrated comparable and clinically acceptable performance in Class I posterior restorations.

Indexed as

Class Iclinical evaluationcomposite resinuniversal compositeUSPHS criteria

Identifiers

PMID42306610
PMCPMC13268577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.