ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
Effect of antacid syrup on the surface roughness and microhardness of composite materials: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of antacid syrup on surface roughness and microhardness of composites. Materials and Methods: Two different composite resin materials, Nanofilled and Suprananofilled were used. Antacid syrup (Digeraft) was used in this original research. Fourteen composite disc shape samples were prepared of size 10 mm × 2 mm, seven samples in each group, two groups were made. The composite discs from both the groups were submerged in 10 ml of Digeraft syrup for 28 days, 2 min each day. The surface roughness was measured at baseline and after 28 days using a mechanical profilometer and an atomic force microscope (AFM). The microhardness was measured using a Vickers device. Statistical Analysis: Data entries were performed using IBM Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0, IBM Corp. (2021), Armonk, NY. Results: The Nanofilled composites showed the highest surface roughness values and lowest microhardness, whereas the Suprananofilled composites had the highest microhardness and lowest surface roughness. Conclusions: From this
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.