ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Establishment and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for in-hospital mortality risk in acute myocardial infarction patients complicated with diabetes mellitus.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for the early diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning-based (ML) predictive model for in-hospital mortality risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled AMI patients with DM from the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College and the MIMIC-IV database. Common variables identified by both LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm were selected as the final feature set. Utilizing the MIMIC-IV database, predictive models were constructed incorporating seven machine learning algorithms based on these common variables. The comprehensive performance of these models was evaluated through extensive metrics in both internal and external validation sets to identify the preferred model. Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to quantitatively analyze and visually display the feature contributions of the preferred model. Results: Seven predictors were identified in this study through variable selection using two distinct methods, including heart rate, neutrophil count, monocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), serum albumin, total bilirubin, and urea nitrogen. Seven different ML models were built based on these predictors. Comprehensive performance evaluation across multiple metrics in both internal and external validation sets has shown that the XGBoost-based model achieved the numerically highest AUC and was selected as the preferred model. By employing the SHAP method for visual interpretation of this model, the interpretability and clinical credibility of the in-hospital mortality prediction model were significantly enhanced. This model can provide valuable auxiliary support in identifying high-risk patients and implementing early intervention measures. Conclusion: Interpretable machine learning models have been developed to predict in-hospital mortality risk in patients with AMI complicated by DM, providing insights into the influence of various features on the prediction outcome. Therefore, this model can serve as an exploratory and auxiliary risk stratification tool limited to clinical settings similar to our study cohorts, and it is not intended for generalized broad clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.