ReviewResearch in pharmaceutical sciences2026
Aseptic meningitis induced by monoclonal antibodies used in cancer treatment: a systematic review.
Review in Research in pharmaceutical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but are associated with a spectrum of adverse events, including neurological complications. Understanding the mechanism and management of complications is crucial for optimizing patient care. The present systematic review aimed to identify case reports of MAbs used for cancer treatment that resulted in aseptic meningitis (AM). Methods: Databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for studies published until March 2024 (updated in May 2025). The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the quality of case report studies, and the methodological quality of the included studies was considered acceptable. Findings/Results: In total, 32 articles were analyzed in the present systematic review. Cetuximab had the highest reported incidence of AM, while rituximab, daratumumab, and apolizumab had the lowest prevalence. The quality of the studies was also acceptable. Conclusion and implications: AM appears to occur more frequently with monoclonal antibodies than with conventional drug structures. Prompt recognition of the underlying mechanisms can help physicians manage these complications more effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.