ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2026
Multiplex qPCR for the early detection of sepsis pathogens and its impact on antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients.
Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Sepsis is a life threatening condition caused by a dysregulated host response to infection and is associated with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early bacterial detection and therapy with antibiotics improve outcomes. We compared multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) to traditional blood culture for early pathogen detection in critically ill patients with suspected sepsis. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study included 200 critically ill ICU patients with suspected sepsis. Multiplex qPCR using the TRUPCR® Sepsis Panel was compared with conventional blood culture for pathogen detection. To assess sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV, blood culture was used as the reference standard. Mortality, ICU stay, and antibiotic therapy time were studied. Multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for baseline severity (SOFA, APACHE II), septic shock, and antibiotic exposure. Results: Multiplex qPCR significantly reduced the time to initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy (5.2 vs 8.3 hours, p<0.001). The assay demonstrated higher sensitivity compared with blood culture for pathogen detection. qPCR positivity was associated with shorter ICU stay and lower mortality; however, these associations were interpreted after adjustment for baseline illness severity. Conclusion: Multiplex qPCR can detect infections early and optimize antimicrobials for sepsis. These findings should be cautiously evaluated and corroborated in larger multicentre trials due to reduced specificity and observational nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.