ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Nurses' usage of validated tools to assess for delirium in general acute care settings: A scoping review.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Delirium occurs in 10-30% of hospitalised adults and is associated with an increased risk of mortality and morbidity. Best practice guidelines recommend the use of validated assessment tools for delirium. However, these tools are infrequently utilised, and delirium is routinely missed. Objective: To explore validated assessment tool usage by registered nurses in general acute care settings to assess for delirium, and the barriers and facilitators to their use. Methods: This scoping review was organised in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Boolean operators were used in combination with key search terms from the research questions. Sources were analysed using frequency counts and results were mapped descriptively. Information sources: CINAHL, PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Bielefeld Academic Search Engine were searched in February 2025. Eligibility criteria: Sources that provided a focus on registered nurses working in general acute care settings and their experiences using validated delirium assessment tools were considered for this scoping review. Results: Forty studies were included in this scoping review. Validated assessment tools were not used frequently by nurses to assess for delirium. Multiple barriers to using validated assessment tools were identified, with the most reported being organisational barriers. Nurses identified "opportunities to learn" as facilitators to using validated assessment tools. Conclusions: Notable heterogeneity among assessment practices were identified. Despite the availability of various validated assessment tools for delirium, usage rates remain low. Nurses have identified numerous barriers to their use, and these must be addressed to ensure accurate delirium diagnosis. Registration: This scoping review was registered on the 15th of January 2025 on Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/6qegb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.