Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306491›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

A comparison of the safety of oral labetalol versus nifedipine to manage hypertension in pregnancy in Australia: a target trial emulation.

Jessica A Atkinson, Anthea C Lindquist, Stephen Tong, Richard J Hiscock, Anna Forsythe, Hannah G Gordon, Susan P Walker, Su Jen Chua, Catherine Cluver, Jenny Myers and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica A AtkinsonPerinatal Epidemiology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anthea C LindquistPerinatal Epidemiology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Stephen TongPerinatal Epidemiology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Richard J HiscockPerinatal Epidemiology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anna ForsythePerinatal Epidemiology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hannah G GordonPerinatal Epidemiology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Susan P WalkerPerinatal Epidemiology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Su Jen ChuaPerinatal Epidemiology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Catherine CluverSAMRC Extramural Preeclampsia Research Unit, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jenny MyersMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Roxanne M HastiePerinatal Epidemiology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Labetalol and nifedipine are two of the most common oral antihypertensives used to manage these conditions; however, it is not clear whether one medication may offer greater benefit to mothers and babies than the other. The aim of this study was to compare the risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes for oral labetalol versus nifedipine among women with hypertension in pregnancy. Methods: This was a target trial emulation using linked data, including pregnancy episodes between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2020 in Victoria, Australia. We included pregnant women with a hypertensive disorder (chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, or preeclampsia) and prescribed oral labetalol or nifedipine between 11+0- and 36+6- weeks' gestation. Our co-primary outcomes were: 1) a composite of maternal mortality or serious morbidity; and 2) a composite of neonatal mortality or serious morbidity. All outcomes were assessed from first prescription until 28 days postpartum. Analyses used a doubly robust inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) model and are reported as adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and risk differences (aRD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Analyses were based on intention-to-treat approach. Findings: 7416 pregnancies were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 6745 (91.0%) pregnancies received labetalol as a first-line treatment and 671 (9.0%) received nifedipine. After adjusting for confounding factors, nifedipine was associated with a 33% increased risk of the composite maternal outcome (6.6% versus 9.4%; aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07, 1.64), and no difference in the risk of the composite neonatal outcome (43.0% versus 46.1%; aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89, 1.06). This was largely driven by increased rates of eclampsia (1.6% versus 3.0%), haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome (3.0% versus 4.3%), and renal failure (1.0% versus 1.5%) in the nifedipine group. Among secondary outcomes, nifedipine use was associated with an increased risk of iatrogenic preterm birth and need for additional antihypertensives. Interpretation: Among women with hypertension in pregnancy, nifedipine was associated with an increased risk of poor maternal outcomes and iatrogenic preterm birth when compared with labetalol. Labetalol may have a better safety profile as a first-line therapy for pregnant women with hypertension. Future clinical trials are required to validate these findings. Funding: This work was supported by a Trevor B Kilvington Bequest, awarded by the University of Melbourne.

Indexed as

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancyLabetalolNifedipinePre-eclampsiaTarget trial emulation

Identifiers

PMID42306491
PMCPMC13266230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.