ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
A comparison of the safety of oral labetalol versus nifedipine to manage hypertension in pregnancy in Australia: a target trial emulation.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Labetalol and nifedipine are two of the most common oral antihypertensives used to manage these conditions; however, it is not clear whether one medication may offer greater benefit to mothers and babies than the other. The aim of this study was to compare the risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes for oral labetalol versus nifedipine among women with hypertension in pregnancy. Methods: This was a target trial emulation using linked data, including pregnancy episodes between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2020 in Victoria, Australia. We included pregnant women with a hypertensive disorder (chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, or preeclampsia) and prescribed oral labetalol or nifedipine between 11+0- and 36+6- weeks' gestation. Our co-primary outcomes were: 1) a composite of maternal mortality or serious morbidity; and 2) a composite of neonatal mortality or serious morbidity. All outcomes were assessed from first prescription until 28 days postpartum. Analyses used a doubly robust inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) model and are reported as adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and risk differences (aRD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Analyses were based on intention-to-treat approach. Findings: 7416 pregnancies were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 6745 (91.0%) pregnancies received labetalol as a first-line treatment and 671 (9.0%) received nifedipine. After adjusting for confounding factors, nifedipine was associated with a 33% increased risk of the composite maternal outcome (6.6% versus 9.4%; aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07, 1.64), and no difference in the risk of the composite neonatal outcome (43.0% versus 46.1%; aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89, 1.06). This was largely driven by increased rates of eclampsia (1.6% versus 3.0%), haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome (3.0% versus 4.3%), and renal failure (1.0% versus 1.5%) in the nifedipine group. Among secondary outcomes, nifedipine use was associated with an increased risk of iatrogenic preterm birth and need for additional antihypertensives. Interpretation: Among women with hypertension in pregnancy, nifedipine was associated with an increased risk of poor maternal outcomes and iatrogenic preterm birth when compared with labetalol. Labetalol may have a better safety profile as a first-line therapy for pregnant women with hypertension. Future clinical trials are required to validate these findings. Funding: This work was supported by a Trevor B Kilvington Bequest, awarded by the University of Melbourne.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.