ArticleJournal of aging research2026
Evaluating the Impact of a One-Year Exercise Program on Probable Sarcopenia in Older Adults.
Article in Journal of aging research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Impact of a One-Year Exercise Program on Probable Sarcopenia in Older Adults.Journal of aging research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The present study was conducted to examine the effects of a 1-year multicomponent exercise training (MCET) program on the physical function and sarcopenia status of community-dwelling older adults with probable sarcopenia. Methods: Data of 132 Brazilian community-dwelling older adults with probable sarcopenia were examined. The MCET program was performed twice a week over 1 year. Physical performance evaluations included (i) timed "up-and-go" (TUG), (ii) one-leg stand, (iii) walking speed (WS) at normal pace and fast pace, (iv) 5-time sit-to-stand (5STS) test, and (v) isometric handgrip strength (IHG). Results: MCET significantly increased TUG (-7.0%), balance (53.0%), 5STS (-10.0%), and WS at normal pace (13.0%). Furthermore, a significant decrease in the prevalence of IHG-based probable sarcopenia was observed (88.6% vs. 67.4%). Conclusions: Findings of the present study indicate that a 1-year intervention program based on an MCET strategy significantly improved multiple physical performance measures and enhanced sarcopenia status in community-dwelling older adults. These improvements may significantly lower the risk of developing adverse outcomes, such as falls, disability, hospitalization, and death. Therefore, the MCET program tested in this study shows promise as a primary care strategy to reduce the burden of physical decline in community-dwelling older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.