Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306448›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2026

Leading While Training: A National Survey of Embedded Chief Residents in Internal Medicine.

Julie L Machen, Carolyn R Guilloud, Emily B Mullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie L Machenis Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Cone Health Teaching Service, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4921-4694
Carolyn R Guilloudis Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Lexington Health Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, West Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0050-9719
Emily B Mullenis Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Lexington Health Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, West Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6210-3841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In internal medicine (IM), an increasing number of chief residents (CRs) are serving while still in training, but their responsibilities and workload remain poorly characterized, leaving program leaders without clear guidance on how to structure or support the role. Objective: To describe the demographics, responsibilities, and experiences of IM CRs serving during residency in the United States. Methods: This was a national cross-sectional survey of IM CRs serving during residency in the 2024-2025 academic year. The 42-item instrument included multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and open-ended items. Because no centralized database of CRs serving during training exists, the number of eligible participants was unknown. The survey was disseminated using a 2-step nonrandom sampling strategy: contacting leaders at 476 potentially eligible programs identified through national directories and distributing the survey through Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine listservs. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests were used. Results: Of 165 respondents, 142 confirmed they were IM CRs serving during residency. Most were postgraduate year 3, non-White, and international medical graduates. Most trained in community-based programs and carried full clinical schedules. Weekly chief work varied, with 38% reporting 2 to 5 hours, 35% reporting 6 to 10 hours, and 14% reporting more than 10 hours. Common duties included enforcing program rules, coordinating backup coverage, and resident well-being support. Although 68% felt prepared for the role, less than half received written expectations (41%) or internal faculty-led training (39%). Conclusions: IM CRs serving during residency commonly maintain full clinical schedules while performing substantial administrative and educational responsibilities, with variable preparation and role expectations.

Indexed as

Internal MedicineInternship and ResidencyLeadershipCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID42306448
PMCPMC13267199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.