ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2026
Comparison of inguinal hernia repair outcomes between open and laparoscopic approaches in a pediatric population: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Many studies compared the outcomes of hernia repair in children between open and laparoscopic techniques. However, the results still need to be clarified. Moreover, the reports from developing countries are also limited. Methods: We compared the outcomes of hernia repair between the open and laparoscopic techniques in children and associated them with risk factors. Results: We involved 92 children, consisting of laparoscopy (36 males and 10 females) and open (42 males and 4 females) methods. There was a significant difference between 2 groups regarding the gestational age and age at surgery (both P < 0.001). Laparoscopy had a shorter length of stay (LOS) than the open group (1.09 ± 0.28 days Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery might have a beneficial effect on shorter LOS compared with open hernia repair. None of the risk factors is significantly associated with hernia recurrence after repair. A further prospective multicenter study with a larger sample size is necessary to clarify our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.