Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306406›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026

'It's given us the opportunity': Patient and clinician experiences of serious illness conversations in the NHS acute setting - Results from a UK Qualitative Study.

Tamsin McGlinchey, Stephen Mason, Jude Robinson, John Edward Ellershaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tamsin McGlincheyPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-4225
Stephen MasonPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, UK.
Jude RobinsonSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.
John Edward EllershawPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite legal and ethical commitments to dignified end-of-life care, open communication with seriously ill patients remains inconsistent across the National Health Service (NHS). The Serious Illness Care Programme was implemented in two NHS hospital sites to improve communication and care planning for patients with serious illness. Aim: Explore the lived experiences of seriously ill patients and their clinicians participating in Serious Illness Conversations. Design: Qualitative study using a phenomenological approach within an interpretive paradigm. Narrative interviews were undertaken, and Reflexive Thematic Analysis was used to identify patterns of meaning. Setting/Participants: Outpatient clinics in two NHS hospital sites: a tertiary cancer centre and a renal unit within a city teaching hospital. Fourteen patients (seven cancer, seven renal failure) and nine clinicians (six oncologists, three nephrologists) were interviewed. Results: The following three interrelated themes were generated from the analysis: (1) Patients described the conversations as ' Conclusion: Findings from this study directly challenge the commonly held belief that these conversations are inherently negative to reveal the transformative power of these important and necessary conversations. They opened up different types of conversations, giving patients agency to direct certain aspects of their life. However, their integration into routine practice is hindered by structural and cultural constraints. Addressing these barriers is essential to ensure all patients have equitable access to these conversations.

Indexed as

communicationhospitalsoutpatientspalliative carepatient-centred carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID42306406
PMCPMC13265982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.