ArticleCureus2026
Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse Secondary to Rectal Adenomatous Polyposis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incarcerated or strangulated prolapsed rectal polyps are an incredibly rare phenomenon, seldom reported in the literature. Given the overall low incidence of rectal prolapse, these instances in which polyposis - a relatively common condition - progress and become emergent are clinically significant. We present a case of a 49-year-old with an acutely incarcerated rectal prolapse of dysplastic villous adenomatous polypoid tissue. The patient presented to our facility with a large, painful rectal mass, passing mucus and bright red blood per rectum after two hours of straining to have a bowel movement. She denied past colonoscopies, anal receptive intercourse, and any personal or family history of bowel disease or cancer. On computed tomography (CT) scans, the incarcerated mass appeared as a full-thickness rectal prolapse with signs of edema and ischemia, prompting emergent surgical intervention. A diagnostic laparoscopy showed no pathology to the large bowel or rectum. The prolapsed mucosal mass was circumferentially resected, and the rectum was reduced. A temporary diverting loop sigmoid colostomy was then created. Surgical pathology reported villous adenoma, extensive high-grade dysplasia, and foci of pseudo-invasion with no evidence of invasive carcinoma. A follow-up rectal exam under anesthesia and flexible sigmoidoscopy identified multiple large rectal polyps but no evidence of rectal ischemia. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged home on hospital day 11 for outpatient follow-up with Colorectal Surgery. Abdominal perineal resection versus transanal transabdominal rectal resection, preserving gastrointestinal continuity, have been offered as options for definitive treatment. Rectal prolapse can be predisposed to occur in the setting of a variety of clinical conditions. Management of prolapses can be complex. In the setting of these rare incarcerated or strangulated prolapsed dysplastic polyps, emergent surgical intervention is still indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.