ArticleCureus2026
Patterns in Curated Celebrity Mortality Data: An Exploratory Analysis of Cardiovascular Disease Representation and Dataset Bias.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublicly reported celebrity deaths receive substantial media attention and may influence how individuals perceive disease burden. However, datasets constructed from publicly available sources are often curated and may not reflect underlying epidemiological distributions. Understanding how dataset construction influences observed mortality patterns is therefore important.
objectiveTo present a purposively curated and openly documented dataset of publicly reported celebrity deaths as a worked methodological illustration of how dataset construction, selection, and reporting practices may shape apparent mortality distributions in media-visible data. MATERIALS AND
methodsA purposively curated dataset of 164 celebrity deaths was assembled from publicly available English-language sources, principally Wikipedia entries and their referenced material. Cases were selected to include variation in age, reported sex, and cause of death to enable descriptive comparison. Causes of death were classified as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular using rules defined a priori, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) cases were further subdivided into six International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-aligned subcategories. To assess classification reproducibility, a blinded second coder independently re-classified a random sample of 30 cases. The dataset, the case-level ICD mapping dictionary, and a reproducible analysis pipeline are openly available.
resultsCardiovascular causes accounted for 84 of 164 deaths in the curated dataset (51.2%); non-cardiovascular causes accounted for 80 deaths (48.8%). Within the CVD group, the largest subcategory was heart failure and other unspecified CVD (33 cases; 39.3%), followed by ischemic heart disease (22 cases; 26.2%), cerebrovascular disease (nine cases; 10.7%), arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death (seven cases; 8.3%), aortic and pulmonary vascular disease (seven cases; 8.3%), and cardiomyopathy and structural heart disease (six cases; 7.1%). The two coders agreed on the binary CVD/non-CVD classification for all 30 cases in the reliability sample (Cohen's κ = 1.00) and on the six-category subcategory classification for all 18 cases that both coders classified as CVD (Cohen's κ = 1.00). Cardiomyopathy and structural cases occurred at a notably younger mean age (35.5 years) than other CVD subcategories. CVD deaths overall occurred at older ages than non-CVD deaths and were predominantly observed among males.
conclusionsThe patterns observed in this curated dataset reflect the combined effects of investigator selection, demographic non-comparability between celebrities and the general population, and reporting practices in publicly available sources. The high proportion of non-specific cause-of-death descriptions illustrates an important component of reporting bias in media-visible mortality data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.