ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Anesthesiology Residents' Eliciting of Patient Questions During Informed Consent with a Patient in Pain.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical practice. Eliciting patient questions during informed consent increases patient engagement and understanding, thus enhancing integrity of the consent process. However, a patient in visible pain can add an additional challenge to the informed consent process. The purpose of this research was to examine if and how anesthesiology residents ask for questions from a patient displaying severe pain during an informed consent simulation. Methods: Anesthesiology residents recruited from three anesthesia residency programs were video recorded performing an informed consent with a 52-year-old White male simulated patient awaiting urgent repair of a perforated gastric ulcer who was displaying verbal and nonverbal signs of pain. Two independent coders evaluated whether, when and how residents elicited patient questions during the informed consent process. Results: Among a sample of 65 first- and third-year anesthesiology residents, more than 20% of residents did not elicit questions during the informed consent encounter. Those who elicited questions typically did so late in the process, with approximately 10% inviting questions only after the consent form had been signed. Most questions were closed-ended (yes/no questions). Although residents did not typically incorporate the patient's name when eliciting questions, most residents demonstrated eye contact. There were no differences in the number or characteristics of questions elicited based on resident gender or level of training. Conclusion: Our findings suggest there is a need for increased education regarding the purpose and approach to eliciting patient questions during the informed consent process, especially for patients who are experiencing pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.