Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306343›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026

Anesthesiology Residents' Eliciting of Patient Questions During Informed Consent with a Patient in Pain.

Danielle Blanch-Hartigan, Elaine C Meyer, Mollie A Ruben, Ariel Henig, Sunny Jeong, David B Waisel, Richard H Blum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danielle Blanch-HartiganDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Bentley University, Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4629-9824
Elaine C MeyerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children's Hospital and Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2309-8189
Mollie A RubenDepartment of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8918-8932
Ariel HenigDepartment of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside/West Hospitals, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Sunny JeongMedical School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
David B WaiselPrivate Practice, Waisel Anesthesiology, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5307-4092
Richard H BlumDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0597-1423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical practice. Eliciting patient questions during informed consent increases patient engagement and understanding, thus enhancing integrity of the consent process. However, a patient in visible pain can add an additional challenge to the informed consent process. The purpose of this research was to examine if and how anesthesiology residents ask for questions from a patient displaying severe pain during an informed consent simulation. Methods: Anesthesiology residents recruited from three anesthesia residency programs were video recorded performing an informed consent with a 52-year-old White male simulated patient awaiting urgent repair of a perforated gastric ulcer who was displaying verbal and nonverbal signs of pain. Two independent coders evaluated whether, when and how residents elicited patient questions during the informed consent process. Results: Among a sample of 65 first- and third-year anesthesiology residents, more than 20% of residents did not elicit questions during the informed consent encounter. Those who elicited questions typically did so late in the process, with approximately 10% inviting questions only after the consent form had been signed. Most questions were closed-ended (yes/no questions). Although residents did not typically incorporate the patient's name when eliciting questions, most residents demonstrated eye contact. There were no differences in the number or characteristics of questions elicited based on resident gender or level of training. Conclusion: Our findings suggest there is a need for increased education regarding the purpose and approach to eliciting patient questions during the informed consent process, especially for patients who are experiencing pain.

Indexed as

anesthesiologydoctor-patient interactioninformed consentpainresident educationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID42306343
PMCPMC13267807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.