ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Deciphering the role of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in prostate cancer: a multi-omics and computational toxicology approach.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal integration of pathomics and single-cell transcriptomics reveals CDC20 as a link between prostate cancer recurrence and benzo[a]pyrene-responsive phenotypes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), persistent environmental contaminants, are associated with increased Prostate cancer (PCa) risk. However, their molecular mechanisms are poorly defined. Methods: We employed a comprehensive computational and experimental framework. The toxicological profiles of PFOA and PFOS were predicted. Shared molecular targets between PFAS and PCa were identified by integrating toxicogenomic and transcriptomic data, followed by protein-protein interaction network and enrichment analyses. A robust prognostic model was built and validated using multiple machine-learning algorithms. Core targets were further investigated via single-cell/spatial transcriptomics and molecular docking. Key findings were functionally validated in DU145 PCa cells using qPCR, Western blotting, and assays for proliferation, migration, and invasion. Results: Computational analysis confirmed the carcinogenic and endocrine-disrupting potential of PFAS. We identified 219 common targets significantly enriched in inflammation, oxidative stress, and cancer-related pathways like PPAR and p53 signaling. Network topology highlighted key hub genes, including ALB and PPARG. A 10-gene machine-learning model demonstrated strong prognostic performance (average C-index: 0.710). Cross-omics analyses pinpointed CDC20 as a pivotal core gene within the PFAS-PCa network. Molecular docking indicated stable binding of PFAS to core targets like CDC20. Conclusion: This work systematically reveals that PFAS exposure is associated with PCa progression, potentially involving dysregulation of core genes such as CDC20 and perturbing critical cancer pathways. The developed prognostic model holds clinical relevance, and the identified natural products offer a foundation for designing interventions to potentially mitigate PFAS-associated carcinogenic effects, advancing both mechanistic understanding and preventive strategies. However, the findings are primarily based on computational predictions and a single cell line; further validation in multiple models and experimental systems is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.