Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306269›Full record

ArticleJTCVS structural and endovascular2026

Dissection dimensions differ: Global variability in ascending aortic size challenges universal surgical thresholds.

Nimrat Grewal, Nora Bacour, Mohammad Zafar, Simran Grewal, Mohammed Idhrees, Bashi Velayudhan, Julia Dumfarth, Simone Gasser, John Elefteriades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS structural and endovascular, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nimrat GrewalDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nora BacourDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohammad ZafarDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aortic Institute at Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Simran GrewalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohammed IdhreesDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Institute of Cardiac and Aortic Disorders, SRM Institutes of Medical Science, Chennai, India.
Bashi VelayudhanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Institute of Cardiac and Aortic Disorders, SRM Institutes of Medical Science, Chennai, India.
Julia DumfarthDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Simone GasserDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
John ElefteriadesDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aortic Institute at Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current surgical thresholds for ascending aortic replacement are derived from Western, male-predominant populations. Whether these thresholds apply across diverse ethnic and geographic groups remains uncertain. We evaluated global and sex-specific variability in ascending aortic dimensions at the time of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1388 surgically treated ATAAD patients from 4 international cohorts: Netherlands (n = 500), United States (n = 382), Austria (n = 435), and India (n = 71). Ascending aortic diameters were measured on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans. Multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, sex, body surface area, hypertension, and diabetes. Results: Age at dissection differed markedly by region, with Indian patients presenting more than a decade earlier than Western cohorts (48.5 years vs ∼63 years). Women presented later than men (68 years vs 59 years; Conclusions: Ascending aortic dimensions at ATAAD vary substantially by sex and geographic origin. Most dissections occur below current surgical thresholds, indicating that absolute diameter alone inadequately defines risk. These findings challenge the universality of fixed cut-offs and support the need for population- and sex-specific approaches to aortic risk assessment.

Indexed as

aortic dissectionascending aortageographic variationrisk stratificationsex differencessurgical thresholds

Identifiers

PMID42306269
PMCPMC13244727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.