ArticleJTCVS structural and endovascular2026
Iliac artery involvement determines optimal therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.
Article in JTCVS structural and endovascular, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The optimal treatment for acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (AUTBAD) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to characterize the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT) in the treatment of AUTBAD and identify anatomic risk factors for OMT failure. Methods: A retrospective review of an aortic database from 2 aortic centers identified 293 patients with AUTBAD treated initially with OMT from 1995 to 2025. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with initial imaging and death status available for analysis. An aortic event was defined as the need for an aortic intervention or an aortic-related death. Results: In total, 153 (52.2%) patients required an aortic intervention or experienced an aortic-related death during the study period. Aortic event-free survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 62.9%, 43.8%, and 37.6%. For the 140 (47.8%) patients successfully maintained on OMT alone, aortic-related survival was 89.4%, 82.2%, and 76.9% at 1, 5, and 10 years. Patients with type B aortic dissection extending into the iliac arteries had a superior aortic event-free survival at 1 (iliac 70.8% vs no iliac 55.5%), 5 (iliac 49.5% vs no iliac 37.2%), and 10 years (iliac 44.6% vs no iliac 28.8%, Conclusions: Patients with AUTBAD and dissections ending proximal to the aortoiliac bifurcation benefit from TEVAR compared with OMT. Conversely, patients with dissections extending into the iliac arteries should be treated with OMT alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.