ArticleAperture neuro2026
A vendor-neutral functional MRI acquisition protocol for multi-site studies.
Article in Aperture neuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autonomy for MRI Field Cameras: Synchronization, Self-Calibration, and Sequence Detection.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an open, vendor-neutral BOLD SMS-EPI protocol tailored for multi-site fMRI studies, intended as a drop-in replacement for conventional vendor-specific acquisition and reconstruction pipelines. Built on Pulseq-an emerging standard for cross-platform MRI pulse sequence development-our protocol ensures identical SMS-EPI pulse sequences and image reconstruction across scanner vendors. This provides, for the first time, known and consistent experimental conditions across sites and scanner software versions. We begin by reviewing the current capabilities of the Pulseq framework, including vendor support and safety considerations. We then detail our SMS-EPI implementation and demonstrate its performance using resting-state fMRI pilot data from healthy volunteers, showing reduced site variance compared to corresponding vendor protocols on Siemens and GE scanners. To support adoption, we provide practical resources to help researchers integrate Pulseq fMRI into their studies, including example text for grant proposals and IRB submissions. These resources are freely available at https://github.com/HarmonizedMRI/Functional. Our vision is for Pulseq fMRI to become the standard for multi-site research, enabling more reproducible science and serving as a reference for the development of novel acquisition and reconstruction methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.